← All posts Workflow

How to share a video for client review privately (without it leaking)

An unreleased ad, a brand campaign, a paid gig under NDA — the review link is the weakest point. Here's how to send a video for review that only the right people can open, and where free file-senders leave it exposed.

If the footage is confidential, the review link is the leak. A cut sent for approval — an unreleased ad, a product launch, a wedding a client hasn’t seen yet — usually goes out on a link anyone can open and anyone can forward. That’s fine for a meme. It’s a problem when the client is under NDA, the campaign hasn’t dropped, or the footage simply isn’t yours to spread. A private review means the link opens for the people you meant it for and no one else, and you can shut it off the moment the job is done.

Most Indian editors and small agencies never think about this until a client asks “is this secure?” — and then a WeTransfer or Google Drive link is a bad answer.

Where the usual tools leave footage exposed

  1. A public link is a forwarded link. A raw Drive or WeTransfer link works for anyone who has it. One “can you check this?” forward and the cut is in a chat you don’t control. You can’t un-send it.
  2. No password, no gate. Free file-senders don’t put a passphrase in front of the video. Access = having the URL, nothing more.
  3. You can’t revoke it. Once the master is downloaded off a link, it exists on someone’s laptop forever. There’s no “turn this off after delivery.”
  4. No idea who opened it. Did the client watch it, or did it get passed to three people you’ve never met? A plain link tells you nothing.
  5. Download-first means copies everywhere. If the client has to download to watch (see why that breaks review), every viewer now holds a full copy of confidential footage.

The file went out. Control over it went with it.

Instead of a public file, upload the cut once and send a review link you can lock down:

  • Put a passphrase in front of it. The client needs the link and a code to get in — passphrase-protect the share so a forwarded URL alone opens nothing.
  • Stream, don’t download. The client watches on the player at full quality without pulling the file down, so there’s no confidential export sitting on a stranger’s machine. They still comment frame-exact right on it.
  • See who opened it. Share activity shows you the link was actually viewed — not guessed at.
  • Shut it off when the job’s done. Stop the share after approval and the link is dead. No lingering access, no “that old link still works.”
  • Wall off the sensitive work entirely. For a client whose whole account must stay private, restricted projects and restricted folders keep it visible only to the people you name.

The review happens on a link you own and can revoke — not a file you’ve lost track of.

“But the client still won’t make an account”

Right — and they don’t have to. A private link is not the same as forcing a login. Reviewers open the link, enter the passphrase if there is one, watch, and comment — no account, no install. Security comes from the gate on the link, not from making the client sign up. That’s the whole trick: review without an account and a link only the right people can open.

You can also put your own branding on the guest page so the client sees your studio, not a generic tool — private and professional in the same link.

How to run a private review

  • Send a review copy, not the master. A 1080p stream is enough to approve on; keep the heavy master off the link entirely. Send that securely only at final handoff.
  • Passphrase the share for anything under NDA. One code, given to the client directly — not typed into the same email as the link.
  • Watch the activity, then close it. Once they’ve approved, stop the share. Job done, link dead.
  • Keep whole clients private when you need to. Sensitive accounts go in a restricted project so nothing leaks between clients.

This is the same flow as any client review — just with the link locked down.

Private review shouldn’t cost enterprise money

Here’s the part the big tools bury: passphrase-protected shares, access control, activity tracking — Frame.io, Filestage and the rest tend to park these behind their top tiers, so a solo editor or a small studio pays enterprise money for a feature they need on one confidential job. Because Editlock is priced on storage, not per seat, the security controls aren’t a paywalled upsell — you’re not buying a bigger plan just to put a password on a link, and adding the client and their whole team to the review costs nothing extra.

Send the confidential cut on a private link, watch who opens it, close it when you’re done. See the plans — the free tier runs a full private review before you pay a rupee.

Get started

Bring your whole team. Pay for none of them.

Start free and run the full review flow — share a cut, collect frame-exact feedback, lock the final. Upgrade only when your library grows.

No credit card. Unlimited reviewers and clients on every plan.